|
|
Mason County PUD #1 A big happy 75th
anniversary to Mason County PUD #1!
This is a significant day, not only for Mason County, but for all
27 of our public utility districts across the state because Mason #1 was
the very first. Collectively these PUDs
provide electricity, sewer, water and telecommunications services to
nearly 2 million Washingtonians.
So this anniversary is also a celebration of the history of the
PUD movement in our state, where we are today and what the future may
bring. Of course this is also
an anniversary year for Mason County itself – the 155th
anniversary. Bonus points to
anyone in the room who can tell me the name of this county for its first
decade. (Answer: Sahewamish, or
Sawamish County, 1854-1864). Is there anyone from the
Washington Grange here? You
Grangers know that our state’s PUD movement really started in 1930 with
the passage of an initiative called the Grange Power Bill, which
authorized public utility districts to form in our state and gave such
districts the force of acquiring needed property by eminent domain.
In fact, the Grange Power Bill
was another first too – it came as a result of our state’s very first
initiative. The initiative formed
the process. But the public power movement
really began to take hold when
Mason County PUD was approved by voters on November 6, 1934 by a vote of
346 to 69. You historians in the audience know that it had taken Washington awhile to get there. Early efforts to organize public utility districts often faced fierce opposition from privately owned utility companies. The first PUD in the United States actually formed in 1880, but once Mason County PUD opened its doors, the rest of the state caught up fast. After the state Supreme Court upheld the PUD law in 1936, the Washington State Grange organized an all-out effort to get PUDs on ballots across the state. Over the next six years, 19 more PUDs would form in Washington. Paul Holme’s history of
Mason County PUD #1 recounts how a lot of people just did not want – or
could not afford – to pay the $150 to buy a share of Hood Canal Mutual
to get the “juice”. There
were also lingering feelings of ill-will toward Tacoma City Light for
its development of the Cushman Dam and the reign of power – so to speak
– that city had over the locals with regards to the main power source.
It was during the Depression and
the anti-corporate sentiment and desire for change won out and support
for the PUD grew. Everyone here must know
the history of Mason County PUD #1 far better than I, so I’ll leave it
to our local historians to tell more of those tales.
After all, those in the
electricity and water business have all the good lines. But, since most of us
here are too young to remember or know, I will mention a few other
things that we know were happening in our state that founding year of
1934. So I will share a few tidbits of our state history from that year. I mentioned November 6
as the day voters approved the PUD. You know what else was on the
statewide ballot that same day? It was the second time voters were asked
to pass a personal state income tax.
A state income tax had actually passed two years before but was
subsequently overturned on challenges by a 5 to 4 vote in the Washington
Supreme Court. It failed by
a significant margin in 1934, and would go on to fail three more times
up to 1975, the year before I started serving in public office. Just a couple of weeks
before that historic election there was a powerful windstorm. On October
21 gusts of up to 83 mph blew across Western Washington. It was the
largest storm to ever to be recorded in this region at that time. The
storm killed 21 people, injured more than 100, and wrecked three ships. In the early 1930s there
were some heated discussions at both the regional and federal levels of
government as to whether to build the Grand Coulee Dam on the Columbia
River high or low. High, of course, was far more expensive and complex.
The first contract for the dam,
which would be a huge Depression-era jobs project under the Public Works
Administration, was awarded in 1934 after bids were opened in Spokane. In fact President
Franklin D. Roosevelt, whose New Deal was still being dealt, came out
later that year to check on the dam’s progress.
But it wasn’t until the following year that Congress authorized
the high dam, one of the largest in the world and currently the fourth
largest producer of hydroelectric power. It also irrigates vast
stretches of land in eastern Washington. A powerful Washington
company of that era as well as this era – the Boeing Company – suffered
a big setback in 1934. The
company was forced by the federal Air Mail Act to divest itself of its
passenger airline holdings, including the company that would become
United Airlines. As a
result, company founder William Boeing sold his stock, retiring to a
life of property development, horse breeding and yachtsmanship.
There was
a massive, west coast-wide strike by maritime workers in 1934. During
the 83 day strike, only one ship managed to leave the harbor at the Port
of Seattle. Over 1,200 members of the Seattle Longshoremen joined
thousands of other maritime workers in closing all seaports between San
Diego and Juneau.
Perhaps equally dramatic in
our state’s history was the death of one prison guard and seven inmates
over at the state penitentiary in Walla Walla during an escape attempt
there.
Clarence Martin was our
state’s governor in 1934. He was known as the “people’s governor”
because of his reputation for frugality when it came to government
spending. In fact there is a
photo of Governor Martin in my office, hanging over a display of office
furniture in the Capitol as it existed in 1934. This collection on top
of an old wood desk includes an Underwood ink-ribbon typewriter, a wire
recorder to capture and help transcribe meetings and something that
appears to be a large, cast-iron stapler but I cannot be entirely sure.
There is also a large, ceremonial spittoon, apparently common in the
day. I imagine that equipment is
almost identical to that which the Mason County PUD had in its
beginnings, if not even slightly superior to what might have been in
your offices. And so far we have come,
both with our technologies – in no small thanks to innovations in our
power supply system – as well as in the kinds of services that you all
in the PUD world provide to the public. Today it is easy to
forget how difficult it was during that era to get affordable utilities.
In all my years in public office I have never taken public
service for granted. But I admit that I have taken power and water
service for granted, something nobody did around here back in the 20s
and early 30s. In fact, thanks to the fine work of our utility
professionals, I think most people do take power for granted. At least
until the electricity goes off unexpectedly.
Only then do the
similarities between the powers of public office and of public power
come together. In both
places people get on the phone and complain.
And I am sure that those of us in politics get a lot more calls
than those in public utility work, as what you all do is far more
certain and reliable. PUDs were founded for
the public good, and still stand today for the public good. According to the
American Public Power Association, more than 2,000 cities and towns in
U.S. are served by public power. Most are locally governed, just like
Mason County PUD #1. Nationally, customers of private power pay an
average of 14 percent more on electricity rates.
PUDs may have started with
electricity, but many have since branched out into other services like
sewer, water and now even into telecommunications like broadband service
for high speed Internet. And the future of public
power continues to look very bright as utility districts continue to
explore new ways to meet the demands of their customers. Alternative energy –
often called green energy –is no longer a radical concept.
It is the subject of legislation
at all levels of government, and stimulus packages contain incentives
for its production as we continue to wean ourselves from the strains of
energy portfolios heavily reliant on foreign oil. New power projects in
solar, wind, and even ocean wave and tidal generated power are being
initiated with great regularity.
Biomass, geothermal,
small irrigation, landfill gas, and municipal waste combustion
facilities are all being looked at increasingly as sources to meet our
energy needs. And along with
green energy of course comes a new category of workers who are employed
in so-called “green collar jobs.” A legislative committee I chair looked
at this issue last year and let me tell you, the future in this area is
very promising. While most of us here
remember the dark days of WPPSS (Woops), nuclear energy is being given a
fresh look today by both our political leaders and our energy
professionals. We will continue to debate the issues of nuclear plant
safety and radioactive waste versus the need for a cheap, renewable
energy supply but in many areas nuclear power is on the front burner of
these policy discussions again.
Hybrid cars continue to be popular choices and plug-in hybrid electric
cars like the Chevy Volt are just
over the horizon – we’ll no doubt have an explosion of these types of
vehicles on our highways over the next decade.
At the same time, we will continue to look at conservation as a viable
alternative to energy consumption as well.
Home
weatherization assistance programs, the promotion of energy-efficient
bulbs in our homes and office buildings will continue to get us there.
In state government we have already introduced four-day a week
work schedules in some departments in order to cut energy use. I know that utilities
will continue to research and implement cost-effective energy programs,
in partnership with our institutions of higher education and our
regional power partners. Issues around global
warming and climate change will continue to impact our decisions about
resource allocation and how energy is produced as well as used. Of course out here in
the western United States, unlike other regions, there are no public
utility districts that produce power from coal. We are far less reliant
on oil than most. By far – and it is no real surprise based on our
climate and geography and of course the magnificent Columbia River – the
greatest amount of energy produced by PUDs along the Pacific is by
hydropower. In fact, we’re
more than double that of the nearest region, the New England and
mid-Atlantic states. That will no doubt continue to be the case for some
time, although whenever I drive to eastern Washington I am amazed by the
number of wind turbines Puget Sound Energy has put up. There are of course many policy, legislative, environmental and technical issues that we must continuously work to address if public utilities are to continue to thrive in the future as they have for the past 75 years. I’m sure Senator Sheldon can address those legislative and policy issues for you. But regardless of the
challenges that may lie ahead, I have no doubt our PUDs will survive,
and continue to perform, innovate and serve us all to the public good. You have an important
voice in Olympia. Now with your great new WPUD Association building in
Olympia, and you are not only more visible there but also have new means
to provide PUD commissioners across the state a higher level of
visibility n our capital. And having my friend and former colleague Erik
Poulsen as your association’s representative in the legislature doesn’t
hurt either. You stole him from the Senate, which was bad for us, but a
great move for the PUDs. As a resident of Mason
County I am proud of our shared history, and proud of this PUD and all
that it has accomplished over its 75 years. Nathan Hale of our
nation’s colonial days said: “Every kind of service necessary to the
public good becomes honorable by being necessary.” It is clear to me that
Mason County PUD #1 has provided service in the public good that is both
necessary and honorable. Happy anniversary.
Congratulations to everyone who has made this happen, and thank
you. |
|
Call the Office of Lieutenant
Governor Owen: (360) 786-7700 |